首页
期刊简介
编 委 会
期刊订阅
百年学会 医星璀璨
名院风范
学科风华
菁英风采
投稿须知
过刊浏览
联系我们
篇名
关键词
作者
作者单位
摘要
关键词
注册本刊作者
作者投稿查稿
专家远程审稿
编辑在线审稿
编务办公专区
主编办公专区
下载文档
《上海医学》审稿费代缴委托书
《上海医学》杂志2025年征订启事
《上海医学》期刊编审系统审稿专家使用手册
工作动态
01-03
《上海医学》杂志2025年度“春蕾杯”论文评比征文通知
03-05
《上海医学》杂志2024年度“春蕾杯”论文评比征文通知
06-14
创新驱动,培育人才—《上海医学》2021年度春蕾计划评审结果揭晓
01-21
《上海医学》期刊影响力指标和学科排名取得显著提升
01-20
《上海医学》恭祝大家新年快乐!
联系方式
发行周期:
月刊
主管单位:
上海市卫生健康委员会
主办单位:
上海市医学会
编辑出版:
《上海医学》编辑部
联系地址:
上海市北京西路1623号
邮编:
200040
电话:
021-62178606
传真:
021-62178606
邮箱:
smasmj@shsma.org.cn
ISSN:
ISSN0253-9934
CN:
CN31-1366/R
收款账号:
1001255309008900719
账户名:
上海市医学会
开户行:
工商银行上海市静安寺支行
友情链接
上海市医学会
当前位置:首页 >
过刊浏览
->
2011年第12期
(颈神经根阻滞治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床研究)
Clinical study on cervical nerve roots block in treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy
浏览(3071) 下载(0)
DOI:
作者:
李浪平 朱婵 李传明 顾明红
Li langping, Zhu Chan, Li Chuanming, Gu Minghong
作者单位:
上海市嘉定区中医医院
Jiading Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词:
神经根型颈椎病;颈神经根阻滞;曲安奈德
Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy; Cervical nerve roots block; triamcinolone acetonide
摘要:
目的 临床观察颈神经根阻滞治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效。方法 在2010年6月-2011年6月间选取神经根型颈椎病患者100例,随机分为观察组64例,对照组36例。观察组采用颈神经根阻滞,常规用药为2%利多卡因2.5ml+醋酸曲安奈德20mg+维生素B12 0.5mg+生理盐水共20ml,每个点注射3-5ml,总量不超过20ml。每周治疗一次,共三次。对照组给予常规方法治疗,包括颈椎按摩、理疗、口服消炎镇痛药物、神经营养药物。治疗3周后观察两组治疗效果,并对结果进行分析。结果 观察组64例治愈42例,好转20例,无效2例,总有效率为98.4%;对照组36例治愈9例,好转18例,无效9例,总有效率为75.0%;观察组明显优于对照组(P < 0.05)。观察组VAS评分在治疗后第一周、第二周和第三周均显著低于对照组(P < 0.05)。结论 颈神经根阻滞治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效确切,值得临床推广。
Objective To observe the efficacy of cervical nerve roots block in the therapy of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Methods 100 cervical spondylotic radiculopathy patients chosen to receive cervical nerve roots block from Jun 2010 to Jun 2011, were randomly divided into observation group (64 cases) and control group (36 cases). The observation group received cervical nerve roots block with injection of 3-5 ml at each point, total dose less than 20ml, applied once per week. Total therapy time was three weeks. The 20ml routine injection contains 2% lidocaine 2.5ml, triamcinolone acetonide 20 mg, VitB12 0.5 mg and 0.9% NaCl. The control group received routine treatment including cervical vertebra massage, oral nonsteroid antiinflammatory drugs and oral neurotrophic drugs. Analysis and comparison of the results after 3 weeks between the two groups. Results Of the 64 cases in the observation group, 42 cases are cured, in 20 cases the therapy shows obvious effect, in 2 cases no effect could be observed, the total efficiency rate is 98.4%. Of the 36 cases in the control group, 9 cases are cures, 18 cases have obvious effect, 9 cases have no effect, the total efficiency rate is 75.0%. The effective rate in the observation group were significantly better than those of patients in the control group (P < 0.05). The observation group showed significantly lower VAS scores in the first, second and third post-treatment week than in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Cervical nerve roots block in the therapy of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy is an effective method which merits to spread.