首页
期刊简介
编 委 会
期刊订阅
百年学会 医星璀璨
名院风范
学科风华
菁英风采
投稿须知
过刊浏览
联系我们
篇名
关键词
作者
作者单位
摘要
关键词
注册本刊作者
作者投稿查稿
专家远程审稿
编辑在线审稿
编务办公专区
主编办公专区
下载文档
《上海医学》审稿费代缴委托书
《上海医学》杂志2024年征订启事回执
《上海医学》期刊编审系统审稿专家使用手册
工作动态
03-05
《上海医学》杂志2024年度“春蕾杯”论文评比征文通知
06-14
创新驱动,培育人才—《上海医学》2021年度春蕾计划评审结果揭晓
01-21
《上海医学》期刊影响力指标和学科排名取得显著提升
01-20
《上海医学》恭祝大家新年快乐!
08-18
作废声明
联系方式
发行周期:
月刊
主管单位:
上海市卫生健康委员会
主办单位:
上海市医学会
编辑出版:
《上海医学》编辑部
联系地址:
上海市北京西路1623号
邮编:
200040
电话:
021-62178606
传真:
021-62178606
邮箱:
smasmj@shsma.org.cn
ISSN:
ISSN0253-9934
CN:
CN31-1366/R
收款账号:
1001255309008900719
账户名:
上海市医学会
开户行:
工商银行上海市静安寺支行
友情链接
上海市医学会
当前位置:首页 >
芬太尼和舒芬太尼喉罩全麻下行EBUS-TBAN术的临床观察
Clinical observation of Fentanyl and Sufentanil used in Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
浏览(876) 下载(0)
DOI:
作者:
唐富东 程华春 张慧君 吕欣
TANG Fu-dong,CHENG Hua-chun,ZHANG hui-jun, LV Xin
作者单位:
同济大学附属上海市肺科医院
Department of Anesthesiology ,Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital,shanghai 200433,China.
关键词:
EBUS-TBNA;全身麻醉;舒芬太尼;芬太尼;喉罩
EBUS-TBNA;general anesthesia;sufentanil;fentanyl;LMA
摘要:
【摘要】目的 观察芬太尼或舒芬太尼复合丙泊酚和琥珀酰胆碱全麻在EBUS-TBAN中的安全性和可行性。方法 选择300例ASAⅠ或Ⅱ,年龄18~70岁,拟行全麻下EBUS-TBAN的患者,随机分为芬太尼组(F组)和舒芬太尼组(S组),每组150例。麻醉方式采用芬太尼或舒芬太尼加静脉泵注丙泊酚和琥珀酰胆碱辅助喉罩控制呼吸的方法。记录患者入室后(T0)、插入喉罩前(T1)、插入喉罩后(T2)、气管镜入气管时(T3),第一次针吸操作时(T4)、气管镜退出气管时(T5)、拔出喉罩后1min(T6)各时间点的BP、HR、SpO2、定向力恢复时间、手术操作者满意度、麻醉医生满意度和术后不良反应发生情况。结果 T1时两组SBP、DBP、HR较T0时下降(P<0.01)且S组下降幅度小于F组(P<0.05);T3、T4、T5时两组SBP、DBP、HR较T0时升高(P<0.05或P<0.01)且S组升高幅度小于F组(P<0.05或P<0.01);两组麻醉医生满意度S组高于F组(P<0.01);两组各时间点SPO2和术后不良反应差异无统计学意义。结论 芬太尼或舒芬太尼复合泵注丙泊酚和琥珀酰胆碱辅助喉罩控制呼吸的麻醉方法均能安全有效的运用于EBUS-TBNA,但舒芬太尼组血流动力学更加稳定,适宜作为EBUS-TBNA的常规麻醉方法。
【ABSTRACT】Objective To observe the safety and feasibility of the general anesthesia which performed with fentanyl or sufentanil combined with propofol and succinylcholine in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). Methods 300 ASAⅠorⅡ patients , aged 18-70yrs, undergoing EBUS-TBNA were evenly randomized into two groups: fentanyl(F) group and sufentanil(S) group. The anesthesia of Group F performed with fentanyl, propofol and succinylcholine. In Group S fentanyl were replaced by sufentanil. SBP,DBP, HR, SpO2, the recovery time of orientation, were recorded right after patient entering the operation room(T0), before (T1)and after(T2) inserted the laryngeal mask, inserted bronchoscope into the trachea(T3), the first time of transbronchial needle aspiration(T4), pull bronchoscope out of trachea(T5), 1min after pull out the laryngeal mask(T6). The satisfaction of operation and anesthesia, incidence of postoperation side effects were evaluated at the end. Results Compared with T0, SBP,DBP and HR of two groups were declined at T1(P<0.01), and group S declined significantly (P<0.05). At T3, T4, T5 SBP,DBP and HR of two groups were higher than T0(P<0.05 orP<0.01), but SBP,DBP and HR of group S raised less than group F(P<0.05orP<0.01). The satisfaction anesthesia is higher in group S (P<0.01). SPO2 and incidence of postoperation side effects were no significant differences. Conclusion General anesthesia in EBUS-TBNA can be safely and efficiently performe with fentanyl or sufentanil combined with propofol and succinylcholine. For the haemodynamics in sufentanil group is more stable, this study recommended sufentanil combined with propofol and succinylcholine to be the preferred anesthesia in EBUS-TBNA.
点击下载DOC全文