首页
期刊简介
编 委 会
期刊订阅
百年学会 医星璀璨
名院风范
学科风华
菁英风采
投稿须知
过刊浏览
联系我们
篇名
关键词
作者
作者单位
摘要
关键词
注册本刊作者
作者投稿查稿
专家远程审稿
编辑在线审稿
编务办公专区
主编办公专区
下载文档
《上海医学》审稿费代缴委托书
《上海医学》杂志2024年征订启事
《上海医学》期刊编审系统审稿专家使用手册
工作动态
03-05
《上海医学》杂志2024年度“春蕾杯”论文评比征文通知
06-14
创新驱动,培育人才—《上海医学》2021年度春蕾计划评审结果揭晓
01-21
《上海医学》期刊影响力指标和学科排名取得显著提升
01-20
《上海医学》恭祝大家新年快乐!
08-18
作废声明
联系方式
发行周期:
月刊
主管单位:
上海市卫生健康委员会
主办单位:
上海市医学会
编辑出版:
《上海医学》编辑部
联系地址:
上海市北京西路1623号
邮编:
200040
电话:
021-62178606
传真:
021-62178606
邮箱:
smasmj@shsma.org.cn
ISSN:
ISSN0253-9934
CN:
CN31-1366/R
收款账号:
1001255309008900719
账户名:
上海市医学会
开户行:
工商银行上海市静安寺支行
友情链接
上海市医学会
当前位置:首页 >
门诊病人经桡动脉径路冠脉造影的可行性和安全性分析(附287例)(重发)
The feasibility and safety of transradial coronary angiography in outpatients
浏览(585) 下载(2)
DOI:
作者:
李伟明,陈清勇,陈艳清,魏毅东,侯磊,王勇,李宪凯,,徐亚伟陆芸岚,杨秀琴
Li Weiming,Chen Qingyong,Chen Yanqing,Wei Yidong,Hou Lei,Wang Yon,Li Xiankai,Xu Yawei,Lu Yunlan,Yan Xiuqin
作者单位:
上海市第十人民医院 同济大学附属第十人民医院
Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital of Tongji University
关键词:
经桡动脉径路;门诊病人;冠状动脉造影
Transradial approach; Outpatient; Coronary angiography
摘要:
【摘要】 目的 探讨门诊病人经桡动脉径路进行冠状动脉造影(CAG)的可行性和安全性。方法 收集自2010年9月至2012年3月因胸闷等不适、冠脉支架术后准备复查在我院心内科门诊就诊,并签署知情同意书接受CAG的患者。即刻常规给予氯吡格雷600mg顿服,阿司匹林300mg嚼服。结果 1年半内累计有287例门诊患者在门诊当天全部顺利完成经桡动脉径路的CAG,结果发现冠状动脉重度狭窄44例,18例即刻完成冠状动脉支架术(PCI)并转住院,4例直接转入院择期PCI,2例家属拒绝PCI,5例建议冠状动脉旁路移植术;冠状动脉心肌桥68例,均直接建议药物治疗。5例(1.7%)因右桡动脉径路扭曲和/或伴痉挛更换左桡动脉完成,3例(1.0%)因穿刺右桡动脉失败改从左桡动脉完成CAG,未出现动静脉瘘及大出血。患者术后均无胸闷不适主诉,桡动脉局部平均加压包扎时间为5.2±0.4小时,7例穿刺部位有轻度血肿或水泡(2.4%),但无需特殊处理。所有患者,除转入住院外,均于压迫止血后即刻平安回家。结论 门诊病人经桡动脉径路行CAG完全可行而且十分安全。
【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of transradial coronary angiography in outpatients. Method From September 2010 to March 2012,,287 outpatients from our cardiovascular department, with precordial discomfort or with a purpose of re-examination after coronary stenting, were recruited. All the participants signed the informed consent of receiving the coronary angiography (CAG), and 600mg clopidogrel and 300 aspirin were routinely prescribed to each subject. Results Of 287 outpatients who received the transradial coronary angiography in his/her one-day visit, 44 patients had severe coronary stenosis, 18 received the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) immediately and transferred to the ward, 4 directly transferred to the ward for the postponed PCI, 2 refused the PCI, 5 suggested to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and 68 with myocardial bridge received drug therapy, Moreover, only 5 (1.7%) and 3 (1.0%) cases were punctured on the left radial artery because of the tortuosity and/or the spasm of the right one or the failure of pucture in the right, respectively. Of note, there was no arterovenous fistula, major hemorrhage, or any percordial discomfort after the operation in the present study. The average compressing time on the puncture point was 5.2±0.4 hours, and only 7 cases had mild hematoma or blister, but with no need of special management. With exception of those patients transferred to the ward, all participants went home safely after the procedure on his/her visiting day. Conclusions From a practical point of view, feasibility and safety of transradial coronary angiography were acceptable in outpatients.
点击下载DOC全文